# Agendula — architecture This document describes how Agendula is built **as it stands today**. For the *why* behind the big decisions and the long-term plan, see [`PLAN.md`](PLAN.md); for status and what's next, see [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md). --- ## 1. The thesis in one sentence Agendula is a Material 3 Expressive task app over the dmfs `TaskContract` — it reads, writes, and reminds against a task store the user chooses: **its own bundled provider** (the default) or an external provider app already on the device (OpenTasks, tasks.org) synced by DAVx5, SmoothSync, DecSync CC and the like. It is the task-list sibling to [Calendula](https://codeberg.org/jlmakiola/calendula), which does the same thing for `CalendarContract`. **Agendula owns storage but not, yet, sync.** That is a deliberate change from the original "owns no database" thesis, settled in [`STORAGE-AND-SYNC.md`](STORAGE-AND-SYNC.md): depending on a provider app being installed made someone else's roadmap a gate on the app working at all. The database is the vendored dmfs provider under *our* authority — our namespace, not a schema written from scratch — so every CalDAV engine still understands it. A sync adapter of our own is the 1.x arc, designed in [`SYNC.md`](SYNC.md). The whole design hangs off one rule: > The entire app talks to a `TasksRepository`. Only the data layer knows there > is a `ContentResolver`, a `TaskContract`, or an authority string behind it. > **Provider column names and the authority string never leak above the data > layer.** That rule is what let Posture B land as an addition rather than a rewrite: the UI, the ViewModels and the domain were untouched by it. See §7. --- ## 2. Layers ``` ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐ UI │ Compose screens + ViewModels (ui/*) │ │ RootScreen → permission gate → ListsScreen │ └───────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘ │ domain models + Flows only ┌───────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐ Domain │ Models, TaskForm, TaskFilter, TaskSorting, │ │ DayWindow (pure Kotlin, no Android) │ └───────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘ │ TasksRepository (interface) ┌───────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐ Data │ TasksRepositoryImpl │ │ └ TasksDataSource (interface) │ │ └ AndroidTasksDataSource │ │ └ ContentResolver / TaskContract / │ │ ProviderResolver / ContentObserver│ │ reminders/ prefs/ di/ demo/ │ └───────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘ │ content:// ┌───────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐ Storage │ Local mode (default): │ │ :provider — our own bundled task provider │ │ same uid, no permission grant needed │ │ External mode: │ │ OpenTasks / tasks.org ←sync← DAVx5 / … │ │ dangerous perms, requested at point of use │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` The seam that matters is the pair of interfaces in the data layer: - **`TasksRepository`** — the only type the UI sees. Flow-based reads, suspend writes. (`data/tasks/TasksRepository.kt`) - **`TasksDataSource`** — the JVM-testable interface that does the actual provider work; `AndroidTasksDataSource` is the only Android-coupled implementation. Both are bound in Hilt in `data/di/DataModule.kt`. --- ## 3. Module & package layout Two modules: `:app` and `:provider`. Package root `de.jeanlucmakiola.agendula`. | Module | Contents | |---|---| | `:provider` | Agendula's own task store — the Apache-2.0 dmfs task provider 1.4.2, vendored in-tree under our authority and permission namespace. Not our code; see [`provider/PROVENANCE.md`](../provider/PROVENANCE.md) for the upstream commit and every deviation. No app code imports from it except `ProviderResolver`, which reads the authority out of its resources. | | Package (`:app`) | Contents | |---|---| | `domain/` | `Models` (TaskList, Task, TaskDetail, enums + pure iCal↔domain value mappers), `TaskForm` (validated create/edit), `TaskFilter` + `TaskFiltering` (smart lists), `TaskSorting`, `AllDayTime` (the two date conventions), `DayWindow` (local-midnight maths). No Android imports. | | `domain/export/` | `ExportModels` + `ICalendarWriter` — VTODO serialization. Pure Kotlin, so the format is JVM-testable. | | `data/tasks/` | `TasksContract` (vendored subset), `ProviderResolver` + `ProviderEnvironment` + `StorageMode` + `StorageModeHolder` (the A/B seam), `TaskProjections`, `ColumnReader`, `TaskMapper` (cursor→domain), `TaskWriteMapper` (form→`ContentValues`), `TasksDataSource` + `AndroidTasksDataSource`, `TasksRepository` + `Impl`, `Failures`. | | `data/export/` | `TaskExporter` (lists → `.ics` documents), `ExportWriter` (SAF plumbing; a floret-kit candidate). | | `data/reminders/` | `ReminderScheduler` (the self-scheduled engine), `DueReminderReceiver`, `BootReceiver`, `ProviderChangeReceiver`, `ScheduledReminderStore`, `TaskNotifier`. | | `data/prefs/` | `SettingsPrefs` (DataStore). | | `data/di/` | `DataModule` (binds + provides), `Qualifiers` (`@IoDispatcher`, `@ApplicationScope`). | | `data/demo/` | `DemoSeeder` (debug-only sample data). | | `ui/` | `theme/`, `common/` (GroupedList, ListChip), `lists/`, `tasklist/`, `detail/`, `edit/`, `settings/`, `permission/` (each a ViewModel + UiState; `lists` also has its screen), `RootScreen`. | | root | `AgendulaApp` (Hilt app), `MainActivity`. | --- ## 4. The data layer (the heart) ### 4.1 Provider targeting — `ProviderResolver` `ProviderResolver.resolve()` returns the active `TaskProvider(authority, readPermission, writePermission, packageName, isOwn)` for the selected `StorageMode`. | Mode | Provider | Authority | Permissions | |---|---|---|---| | **Local** (default) | ours, bundled | `de.jeanlucmakiola.agendula.tasks` | **none** — same uid | | External | OpenTasks | `org.dmfs.tasks` | `org.dmfs.permission.READ_TASKS` / `WRITE_TASKS` | | External | tasks.org | `org.tasks.opentasks` | `org.tasks.permission.READ_TASKS` / `WRITE_TASKS` | All three are backed by the same dmfs `TaskProvider` — ours *is* that provider, vendored — so the **same `TaskContract` columns apply** throughout. `hasPermission()` short-circuits to `true` for our own provider: a same-uid caller bypasses a provider's permission checks outright, so `ProviderStatus.NEEDS_PERMISSION` can never fire in Local mode. In External mode it checks both runtime perms, and `null` from `resolve()` drives the "install a tasks provider" gate. **Choosing the mode.** An explicit choice is stored in `SettingsPrefs` and mirrored into the resolver by `StorageModeHolder` — the resolver is consulted synchronously on every query and cannot read DataStore itself. When there is no explicit choice (the normal case), `autoMode()` decides: > **External if we already hold an external provider's runtime permission, > otherwise Local.** That permission is dangerous-level, so it can only be there because an earlier version asked and the user agreed — the signature of an existing Posture A user, who must not be dropped onto an empty store and left to conclude their tasks were deleted. A fresh install holds nothing and gets local-first storage. The platform calls sit behind `ProviderEnvironment` so this decision is unit tested on the JVM (`ProviderResolverTest`) rather than only on a device. **Storage modes** are `LOCAL` and `EXTERNAL` only. `STORAGE-AND-SYNC.md` describes three, but *Synced* is not a third store — it is the same store with an account attached, so it stays derived state. ⚠️ **What this used to say — "so turning sync on is not a migration" — is wrong.** A task list's `ACCOUNT_NAME`/`ACCOUNT_TYPE` are write-once in the provider (`processors/lists/Validating.java:68-76`), so local lists cannot be re-pointed at an account; tasks have to be moved into new lists. Not modelling `SYNCED` as a mode is still right, but the migration it implied away is real. See [`SYNC.md`](SYNC.md). ### 4.2 `TasksContract` A vendored subset of the Apache-2.0 OpenTasks `TaskContract` — column names, table paths, status/priority constants, the local-account type. Agendula does **not** take a runtime dependency on OpenTasks; the authority is injected from `ProviderResolver`, never hardcoded in the contract. ### 4.3 Reads — Instances + `ContentObserver` `AndroidTasksDataSource` queries the denormalized **instances** view (so each occurrence is a row with the joined list colour, account, etc.), maps each cursor row through `ColumnReader` → `TaskMapper` → domain `Task`, and exposes the result as a `Flow`. A `ContentObserver` on the active authority's Tasks/TaskLists URIs bridges into the Flow via `callbackFlow`, so **any change re-emits** — Agendula's own writes *and* external sync (DAVx5 pulling new tasks) update the UI live, and multiple sync sources coexist in one list. ### 4.4 Writes — repository API ```kotlin interface TasksRepository { fun taskLists(): Flow> fun tasks(filter: TaskFilter): Flow> fun taskDetail(taskId: Long): Flow suspend fun createTask(form: TaskForm): Long suspend fun updateTask(taskId: Long, form: TaskForm) suspend fun setCompleted(taskId: Long, completed: Boolean) // the core gesture suspend fun deleteTask(taskId: Long) suspend fun createLocalList(name: String, color: Int): Long fun providerStatus(): ProviderStatus // READY | NEEDS_PERMISSION | NO_PROVIDER } ``` `TaskWriteMapper` turns a validated `TaskForm` into `ContentValues`. Completion sets `STATUS = COMPLETED` (+ percent/completed timestamp); DAVx5 syncs that back out as a normal VTODO status change. Writes to local/unsynced lists use the sync-adapter URI form where the provider requires it. ### 4.5 Domain model notes - `Task.id` is the **instance** row id; `Task.taskId` is the underlying `tasks._id` and the stable target for edits/completion. - Subtasks are carried via `parentId` (`RELATED-TO` / `RELATION_TYPE_PARENT`); `TaskDetail` bundles a task with its direct children. - `effectiveColor` = the task's own colour, else the list colour. - iCal priority is bucketed to `NONE/LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH`; status maps to a 4-value enum. Both mappings are pure functions in `Models.kt`, unit-tested. --- ## 5. Smart lists, filtering, sorting `TaskFilter` is either `OfList(listId)` or `Smart(SmartList)`. The smart lists — `ALL, TODAY, UPCOMING, OVERDUE, NO_DATE, COMPLETED` — are computed from due dates, not membership. `TaskFiltering.matches()` is a **pure predicate** taking `todayStart`/`todayEnd` (local-midnight bounds from `DayWindow`), so it unit-tests with a fixed clock. `TaskSorting` orders within a list (due / priority / etc.). None of this touches Android, which is why it's all in `domain/`. --- ## 6. Reminders — the one subsystem that does NOT mirror Calendula Calendula relies on the calendar provider broadcasting `EVENT_REMINDER`. **Tasks providers broadcast nothing**, so Agendula schedules its own (`data/reminders/`): - **`ReminderScheduler.sync()`** reads upcoming, non-closed, due-dated tasks within a rolling **30-day window**, computes each trigger as `due − lead` (lead from `SettingsPrefs`), and **diffs against `ScheduledReminderStore`** so only changed alarms move. It bails and clears everything if the provider is absent or unpermissioned. - Alarms are exact where allowed (`setExactAndAllowWhileIdle`, falling back to `set` when `canScheduleExactAlarms()` is false), keyed by `taskId`. - **`DueReminderReceiver`** fires → posts via `TaskNotifier` (channel, `POST_NOTIFICATIONS` gate, dedupe-by-tag). - **Re-sync triggers:** app start, **`BootReceiver`** (re-arm after reboot), and **`ProviderChangeReceiver`** (`PROVIDER_CHANGED` on both authorities → external sync changed the data). The store lets each run diff like Calendula diffs reminder rows. This is the single largest piece of genuinely-new code in Agendula. --- ## 7. The A / B seam (why the layering is shaped this way) Both terms were **redefined** by [`STORAGE-AND-SYNC.md`](STORAGE-AND-SYNC.md). They no longer mean what earlier drafts of this document said. - **Posture A** — front-end over an *external* provider (OpenTasks, tasks.org). Still fully supported; it stopped being the only option and became a user choice, `StorageMode.EXTERNAL`. - **Posture B (shipped)** — the `:provider` module: the Apache-2.0 dmfs provider vendored under **our own** authority `de.jeanlucmakiola.agendula.tasks` and our own permission namespace. It **coexists with everything and replaces nothing**. > **Dead end, do not revisit:** bundling the provider under dmfs's *own* > authority so DAVx5 would sync into it unwittingly. Two apps cannot declare the > same authority (`INSTALL_FAILED_CONFLICTING_PROVIDER`) or the same > `` name (`INSTALL_FAILED_DUPLICATE_PERMISSION`), so anyone with > OpenTasks installed simply could not have installed Agendula. Account > visibility is also keyed by *package*, not authority, which would have left the > bundled provider seeing zero accounts and pruning synced lists as orphaned. > Full reasoning in `STORAGE-AND-SYNC.md`. The seam earned its keep: `ProviderResolver` is still the only thing that knows an authority exists and `AndroidTasksDataSource` the only thing that touches a resolver, so vendoring an entire content provider **changed no UI, no ViewModel, no domain type, and not one line of `TasksRepository`.** Bundling the provider bundles **storage, not sync**. Our own sync adapter is a separate, later piece of work — designed in [`SYNC.md`](SYNC.md), and it lands *underneath* this same seam: it writes through `TaskContract` with `CALLER_IS_SYNCADAPTER`, so the layers above it stay untouched a second time. --- ## 8. UI Compose + Material 3 **Expressive** (`MaterialExpressiveTheme`, `MotionScheme.standard()`, dynamic colour with a hand-tuned warm-mauve fallback in `ui/theme/`). Each screen area (`lists`, `tasklist`, `detail`, `edit`, `settings`, `permission`) has a ViewModel + immutable `UiState`; `ListsScreen` is the first rendered surface. `RootScreen` is the entry composable: it gates on `ProviderStatus` (`NO_PROVIDER` / `NEEDS_PERMISSION` → onboarding `Gate`; `READY` → `ListsScreen`). The remaining screens are being built one at a time — their ViewModels exist and are tested against the real data layer; navigation callbacks are currently stubs (see [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md)). Follow the `material-3` skill for component choices (M3 `ListItem` rows, expressive checkbox/FAB/swipe motion). --- ## 9. Dependency injection Hilt, `SingletonComponent`. `DataModule` has a `@Binds` module (`TasksDataSource` → `AndroidTasksDataSource`, `TasksRepository` → `TasksRepositoryImpl`) and a `@Provides` module (the `agendula_prefs` DataStore, the `@IoDispatcher`). `AgendulaApp` is the `@HiltAndroidApp` entry point; `MainActivity` is `@AndroidEntryPoint`. ViewModels get the repository injected. --- ## 10. Build & tooling | | | |---|---| | Build | AGP 9.2.1, Kotlin 2.3.21, KSP, Hilt 2.59.2, Java 17 | | SDK | compileSdk 37, minSdk 29 (Android 10), targetSdk 36 | | UI | Compose BOM 2026.05.01, Material3 `1.5.0-alpha21` (Expressive APIs), Glance 1.1.1 (widget, later) | | Other | DataStore, DocumentFile (SAF export), kotlinx-datetime, kotlinx-coroutines | | `:provider` | Java 17, `org.dmfs` jems / rfc5545-datetime / lib-recur (all Maven Central — no new repository; `settings.gradle.kts` stays `google()` + `mavenCentral()` under `FAIL_ON_PROJECT_REPOS`) | | Tests | `:app` is JUnit5 (Jupiter) + Truth + Turbine + coroutines-test, with the data source and `ProviderEnvironment` as the JVM-testable seams. **`:provider` is JUnit4 + Robolectric** — upstream's own suite, kept as written rather than rewritten, since that coverage is what makes vendoring safe. Don't add `useJUnitPlatform()` there. | | Versioning | committed `versionName` is the source of truth; a bump reaching `main` triggers the release and the pipeline mints the `vX.Y.Z` tag. `versionCode = MAJOR*10000 + MINOR*100 + PATCH`. See [`RELEASING.md`](RELEASING.md). | | CI | Split by forge: `.forgejo/workflows/ci.yaml` on Codeberg (canonical, no secrets), `.gitea/workflows/release.yaml` on Gitea (all secrets). See [`RELEASING.md`](RELEASING.md). | | Distribution | F-Droid (`fdroid-metadata/`) + Codeberg release APKs | --- ## 11. Manifest surface - **Declared by `:app`:** both `org.dmfs.*` and `org.tasks.*` read/write tasks perms (static manifest, so they are always declared; requested at runtime only in External mode); `POST_NOTIFICATIONS`, `RECEIVE_BOOT_COMPLETED`, exact-alarm (`USE_EXACT_ALARM` on 33+, `SCHEDULE_EXACT_ALARM` ≤32). - **Declared by `:provider`:** the `` itself plus our own `de.jeanlucmakiola.agendula.permission.READ_TASKS` / `WRITE_TASKS` and their permission group. These exist for **other** apps — Agendula reaches its own provider same-uid and neither declares a `uses-permission` for them nor asks. The provider is `exported="true"` on purpose: that is what would let DAVx5 write into it once it knows our authority. - **Deliberately absent:** `GET_ACCOUNTS` (stripped from the vendored provider — see change 1 in `PROVENANCE.md`) and `INTERNET`, which stays undeclared until sync actually ships. Export needs no storage permission at all; SAF hands us a `Uri` the user picked. - **``** for package visibility: both *external* provider authorities + a LAUNCHER intent (so `resolveContentProvider` works and onboarding can open the provider / a store listing). Our own provider needs no entry. - **Receivers:** `DueReminderReceiver` (not exported), `BootReceiver`, `ProviderChangeReceiver` (all three authorities, ours first — an intent-filter host must be a literal), and the vendored provider's own `TaskProviderBroadcastReceiver`. No `EVENT_REMINDER` receiver — that's a Calendula thing that doesn't apply here.