Revert 4aa65ed's approach. It read the Forgejo 500 as being caused by
target_commitish, and pushed the tag to Codeberg first so the release could
attach to an existing tag without one. That inverted the actual failure:
Forgejo 500s on POST /releases precisely WHEN the tag already exists, so
pre-pushing it guarantees the error it was meant to avoid.
The second half then can't recover — a bare tag is not a release, so
GET /releases/tags 404s and the upsert has no id, which is the
"Could not resolve Codeberg release id" that ended the 0.3.1 run.
0.3.0 published fine because it POSTed while the tag was still unsynced and
let the API mint tag + release together. Do that deliberately instead of by
luck: if no release owns the tag, delete the mirrored tag, then POST with
target_commitish. Branches mirror reliably (main was already at the release
commit when 0.3.1 failed), so the commit is present and only the raced-in
tag was in the way. Deleting it is safe exactly because no release owns it.
An existing release still takes the PATCH path and skips the delete, so
re-runs never disturb something already published.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Jean-Luc Makiola
05c75bafa7