fix(#515, #325): review round 1 - multi-line RDATE, accepted occurrences of declined series copied, partial copies say so
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
30af150197
commit
028d8d0e1e
9 files changed
+44
-22
No files matched your search
@@ -521,7 +521,8 @@ as before.
|
||||
**`RDATE` travels like `EXDATE` (#515).** A series can repeat by listed dates
|
||||
alone. The provider stores `RDATE` in the same `<zone>;<stamps>` form as
|
||||
`EXDATE`, so `exportRecurrenceDates` resolves it the same way to UTC stamps (or
|
||||
bare days for an all-day series); a `PERIOD` entry keeps its start. `IcsWriter`
|
||||
bare days for an all-day series), line by line where several `RDATE`s were
|
||||
stored; a `PERIOD` entry keeps its start. `IcsWriter`
|
||||
writes it as `RDATE:` / `RDATE;VALUE=DATE:`, anchors such a series to its zone
|
||||
like an RRULE series, and writes its `EXDATE` too; `IcsParser` reads `RDATE`
|
||||
through the same normalisation as `EXDATE`, so a foreign `TZID` or floating
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user