Codeberg became canonical for issues, PRs and releases, but there was nothing telling a contributor how any of it works — no CONTRIBUTING.md at all, and no contributor entry point in the README. The workflow it documents is issue-first: a feature needs a yes-or-no before it needs code, since whether Calendula should do a thing is the one decision a patch cannot make. Both features and bugs get a milestone, and that milestone names the branch a PR targets (2.18.0 -> release/v2.18.0), because main is a release trigger rather than a staging area. Typo and docs fixes skip straight to a PR — an issue-per-typo helps nobody. Two traps get their own sections because both waste a contributor's whole afternoon: translations never go through PRs (Weblate owns every values-* file, German included, and overwrites hand-edits on the next sync), and a clone without --recurse-submodules cannot configure at all, since floret-kit is a composite build compiled from source. The rules section is the invariants that actually turn into review comments — no network, no second database, no hand-patching UI state after a write, domain/ free of Android imports, JVM-first tests, and the reproducible-build flags that the official F-Droid repo depends on.
703 B
703 B
name, about, title, labels
| name | about | title | labels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crash report | Report a crash. Calendula can capture this for you (Settings → Report a problem, or the prompt after a crash) — it copies the report to your clipboard and prefills this form. | Crash: |
|
What happened
Crash report
(paste the crash report here)